beta
Text
1. The Defendant: KRW 73,860,00 for Plaintiff A; KRW 3,00,000 for Plaintiff B; and KRW 500,000 for Plaintiff C and D, respectively.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. 1) The F, which operates a personal business entity E, was awarded a subcontract for the design work from the Defendant during the process of manufacturing a house for a vessel built by the Defendant. 2) On November 10, 2012, the Plaintiff A, as an employee E, was performing the pipe work at the site of the pre-resident work in the Defendant Company located in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Ulsan-gun, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, 1213.
3) Although lighting lights were installed in the above work site, it was difficult to keep the light, and safety measures, such as installing safety networks to prevent fall, were not taken, and work routes for safe movement of workers were not installed. (4) Plaintiff A was in the course of moving the block between blocks for pipeline operations, and was suffering from injury, such as scarcity damage in spine with a height of about 2.5 to 3 meters away from the opening.
(5) The above work site is located in the Defendant’s workplace, and the Defendant established a safety management division at the above work site, thereby providing safety education to workers including Plaintiff A. 6) Plaintiff A received temporary disability compensation benefits of KRW 23,537,610 and disability benefits of KRW 27,51,570 from the date of the instant accident to November 8, 2013.
7) Plaintiff B’s wife, Plaintiff C, and Plaintiff D are the parents of Plaintiff A. [In the absence of any dispute over grounds for recognition, the entries in the evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3-1, 2, 6-11, 12, 14, 17, 21-2, 13-2, 2, 5-2, and 5-2, and the purport of the whole pleadings.
B. The occurrence of responsibility and the limitation of this accident are located in the defendant's workplace, and in the above workplace, E is not only the chairman's work subcontracted, but also the sub-chairperson's electrical power boat, and pipinging work are deemed to have been undertaken simultaneously.
Thus, the defendant.