logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원통영지원 2015.05.28 2013가합2074
공사대금
Text

1. Among the instant lawsuits, construction cost due to the error of correction and addition of Plaintiff A and the calculation of weight.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the party is a company with the main purpose of shipbuilding, remodeling, repair, etc., and the Defendant’s subcontractor entered into a basic contract for construction subcontracting with the same content as the attached Table 1 (hereinafter “instant basic contract”) while subcontracting construction work, such as the block assembly, tower, design, seal, etc. under construction by the Defendant to the subcontractor.

B. The Defendant calculated and paid the subcontract price for each vessel block x unit price for each vessel unit when he/she entrusts the subcontractor with the manufacture of the vessel block assembly, towering, design, and painting work. At the second day of each month, the Defendant prepared a unit price agreement for each vessel type and entered into an individual contract with the subcontractor on the second day of each month. In addition, the Defendant ordered the subcontractor to revise and add the subcontract price in the event of any change in design, etc. in relation to the subcontract transaction. In such case, the subcontract price was determined by the method of “number of work hours x rental rate” and the relevant subcontractor received work details, etc. from the subcontractor and determined the number of work days each month, and settled the subcontract price calculated by multiplying the unit price agreement by the rental rate and the settlement and agreement with the subcontractor.

C. On June 27, 2013, the Fair Trade Commission decided that “the Defendant, including D, shall unilaterally reduce the subcontract price by entrusting ten subcontractors with the manufacture of the vessel block tower, design, etc., without consultation with the subcontractor,” and the Fair Trade Commission decided that “the Defendant shall not resume such act, and shall pay a total of KRW 2,693,849,850, and a total of KRW 126,107,336, August 2, 2013.”

arrow