logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2013.10.11 2013고단2054
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From March 2013 to May 14, 2013, the Defendant: “C” located in Ansan-si Member B; “C” installed six secret rooms with simple erosion; and arranged sexual traffic by having female employees D, etc. do sexual intercourse with the said male descendants using a mixed sea with cash in return for sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. A copy of the control report on public morals business;

1. Related photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiry reports on criminal records, etc. and investigation reports (report on attachment to judgment and attachment of judgment, and report on calculation of additional collection charges);

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service businesses under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. The Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging the sexual traffic additionally. Article 25 (2 million won 】 Business period 2 months);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, based on the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime even though he/she had been sentenced twice or more due to the same kind of crime, and again committed the instant crime, the Defendant is punished by imprisonment with prison labor. However, the operating period of the instant case is relatively short, and the Defendant has no criminal record of suspended execution or more, and the Defendant is against the Defendant’s wrong recognition of his/her fault, etc., the Defendant, while suspending the execution of imprisonment with prison labor

arrow