logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.01.21 2015고정4353
과실치상
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is as follows: (a) around 17:30 on October 4, 2015, the Defendant was carrying a return dog and a book in front of Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul; (b) so there are many players, so it is necessary to pay attention to the opening so as not to cause any damage to the players by giving a table to the opening; (c) even though the Defendant neglected to do so; and (d) the Oralone of the opening of the victim C (54) and the victim caused the injury to the victim, such as a bid, etc., for which the number of days of treatment cannot be known to the victim, because the victim was plpl up or plucked by the Hand of the victim.

However, this case is a crime falling under Article 266 (1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 266 (2) of the Criminal Act. According to the statement of "non-written application for punishment" bound in the trial records, the victim C withdraws his/her wish to punish the defendant on January 20, 2016, which is after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow