logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.05.17 2016고정136
과실치상
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant has a duty of care to write down the pets of charges and to manage the pets in a manner that does not pose any danger and injury to the players.

그럼에도 불구하고, 피고인은 2015. 6. 20. 21:10 경 파주시 C 아파트 511 동 앞 노상에서 애완견 스피츠( 흰색, 중간 크기 )를 데리고 가 던 중, 길을 지나가던 피해자 D에게 개가 달려들면서 짖어 이에 놀란 피해 자가 뒤로 물러나면서 허리를 삐끗 하게 하였다.

As a result, the Defendant caused the injury of the victim to the base base of the 2 weeks of medical treatment.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 266(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 266(2) of the Criminal Act.

On April 14, 2016, the victim D expressed his/her intention that he/she does not want to be punished by the Defendant after the instant prosecution was instituted.

Therefore, the prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow