Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a computer part distributor, and the victim C (V, 50 years old) is a person who runs a "D" dan.

On March 30, 2017, around 01:40 on March 30, 2017, the Defendant: (a) when a dispute arose with the victim due to the drinking value in the “D” entertainment bar located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E; (b) expressed the victim’s desire to “clocks, young people,” etc.; and (c) for police officers dispatched upon the victim’s report, “in the case of a new police officer”;

Along with the 40 minutes of the victim’s entertainment business by force, such as: (a) chrops, chrops, and flaps of this police officer’s clothes; and (b) flapsing back to the main points, taking images of the inside and outside of the main office of a mobile phone camera and of the police officer’s videos with the mobile phone camera; and (c) taking images of the inside and outside of the main office of a mobile phone camera and the police officer’s sound “within the inside and outside of the inside”, thereby obstructing the victim’s entertainment business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Photographs of a business license;

1. Business registration certificate photographs;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing receipts photographs;

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment

1. The summary of the crime committed by the Defendant, at the same time and at the same place as the above facts constituting the crime, was sexually insulting the victim by openly insulting the victim, including: (a) the victim’s desire to talk with the victim, including, but not limited to, the time and place of singing; and (b) the victim’s desire to talk with the victim, including, but not limited to, the victim’s participation in singing and other tables; and (c) the police officer continued to talk with, the victim, including, but not limited to, the year of weather, the weather, the opening of weather, and the opening of the house.”

2. The instant case is a crime falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only upon a victim’s complaint under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the intent to revoke the Defendant’s complaint on April 24, 2018 is specified.