1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 7,00,000 with respect to the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from November 17, 2015 to June 15, 2017.

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant B is the issuer and employer of Defendant C, the Internet newspaper company that mainly reports food-related news, and Defendant C is the reporter of Defendant C.

B. During the period from September 22, 2015 to November 17, 2015, Defendant C posted the title of the “news” column on each day of the “news” column in the attached Table [List of News Articles] in a large number, and written each article, and the article was posted in the E-Internet News column on the same day.

C. Defendant C’s above-mentioned

The main contents of the article as described in the foregoing paragraph are as shown in the [Attachment 1] (No. 12] through [Attachment 12], and [Attachment 1], [Attachment 1], [Attachment 2], [Attachment 11], and [Attachment 12], respectively], and (hereinafter “each of the instant articles,” if all of the contents of the above articles are referred to as "each of the instant articles.”

) This is currently published in E, Internet portal site F, G, H, and I (attached Form 2 and a vehicle accident photograph and explanation among the articles and articles No. 4). It is part of the articles and articles No. 2 and No. 4, and [Attachment 2] [Attachment 2] is part of the articles and articles No. 2.

(i) [Facts without dispute over the grounds for recognition, the whole purport of the pleadings.]

2. The parties' assertion

A. Plaintiff 1) Each of the instant articles has undermined the Plaintiff’s reputation by expressing false facts or suggesting false facts in the form of a medical specialist. Defendant C prepared and published an article as soon as possible without making any necessary investigation or verification to verify the authenticity of the alleged facts that each of the instant articles indicated or proposed. As such, the Defendants did not err in its illegality on the grounds that there are considerable grounds to believe that each of the instant articles is true.

3. Accordingly, Defendant C is the originator of each of the articles of this case, and Defendant B is the employer of Defendant C, who is the issuer of this case, and the Defendants jointly do so.