1. On May 20, 2013, Daejeon District Court Decision 2013No. 666 dated May 20, 2013, the name of the Defendant’s building.

On November 15, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant, who was entrusted with the management by the Ministry of National Defense, the Office of National Defense, for the lease of Daejeon-gu B and C (hereinafter “instant land”) (hereinafter “instant contract”).

On the ground of the instant land, the Plaintiff installed facilities for the second class neighborhood living facilities, put to place place orders, etc. (hereinafter “instant facilities”) on the ground of the instant land, and disbursed KRW 125 million for the purchase cost of human turfy, KRW 50 million for the construction cost of human turfy, KRW 20.9 million for the electrical construction cost, KRW 20.9 million for the electrical construction cost, and KRW 198 million for the construction cost, such as a retaining wall, a retaining wall, a parking lot, and gravel.

On May 20, 2013, the Daejeon District Court Decision 2013No. 666, the telephone call for the content of the instant contract was established as a compromise clause, and the protocol of protocol recorded in the text was prepared (hereinafter “instant protocol of protocol”).

Of the instant protocol of conciliation, the part relating to the instant case is as follows.

Article 2 (Use and Profit-making of Real Estate) (1) The land use fee for the first-year contract (from November 15, 2012 to November 14, 2013) shall be KRW 100,220,000 per year (in addition, KRW 1.5% per annum) and the payment shall be made in four installments per year.

(4) B (the Plaintiff in this case) may establish a temporary building (excluding a permanent building) with the approval of the Minister of National Defense for business purposes.

Article 3 (Duration of this Agreement) The duration of this Agreement shall be two years from the date of conclusion of this Agreement.

(1) On November 15, 2012, from November 14, 2014 to November 14, 2014), where the land use plan of Party A (the Defendant of this case) or the Office of National Defense (Ministry of National Defense) is not determined upon expiration of the period, Party A and Party B may extend the period of contract with the approval of the Minister of National Defense as stipulated in the State Property Act,

Article 5 (Lighting and Restoration to Original State) (1) Where a contract is terminated or terminated, the restoration to original state shall be completed (including removal, if a temporary structure exists) in the site prior to the first use or profit-making due to the expenses of Eul, and it shall be completed to Gap.