Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

The defendant will pay 320,000 won to the applicant by deceitation.

Punishment of the crime

On March 27, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment due to fraud, etc. by the District Court of the Republic of Korea on March 27, 2014, and completed the execution of the sentence on April 29, 2014.

On November 20, 2014, the Defendant posted a notice to sell Aphone 6 on the Internet opening site, and sold Aphone 62 to Aphone 6 to the victim D who reported and contacted the Defendant.

A false statement was made.

However, even if the defendant receives the payment from the injured party, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to sell the victim 6 Phphones.

The Defendant received 1,050,000 won from the damaged party, namely, the Agricultural Cooperative E account in the name of the Defendant.

On March 27, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment due to fraud, etc. by the District Court of Jung-gu on March 27, 2014, and completed the execution of the sentence on April 29, 2014.

1. On September 13, 2015, the Defendant, on the victim F, posted an advertisement with the content that he/she would sell a set of gallon 3 on the Internet opening site. On September 13, 2015, the Defendant, on the victim F, who reported and contacted the above writing, will send goods to the victim F.

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have intention or ability to sell gallon 3 plon.

After all, the defendant received 120,000 won from the victim's bank account (G) in the name of the defendant immediately from the victim to receive the money.

2. On November 19, 2015, the Defendant, on the victim H, posted an advertisement stating that he/she would sell a phone 4 on the Internet website around November 19, 2015, and then send the product to the victim H who reported and contacted the above article “on the advance payment of the price.”

“A false representation was made.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to sell the victim with a heavy phiphone 4.

Accordingly, 90,000 won from the account as described in the above paragraph 1 for the purpose of payment from the damaged person, and the corporate bank in the name of the defendant.