logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.03.22 2018고단116
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2018 Highest 116]

1. On October 27, 2017, the Defendant, against the victim C, posted a false statement on the Internet, stating that “Aphone 7 is sold” to “aphone 7” on the Internet, and that the victim contacted C, who read that “the Defendant would deliver the price for the goods in advance upon confirmation.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have 7phones, and there was no intention or ability to send them.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 100,000 won from the company bank account (D) in the name of the defendant as the sales proceeds of the mobile phone from the victim.

2. On November 1, 2017, the criminal defendant against the victim E made a false statement to the victim E in the same manner as paragraph (1) at a closed place, and he/she received 50,000 won from the company bank account (D) in the name of the defendant under the name of the business bank account in the name of the victim for the sales proceeds of the cell phone attached to the victim.

3. On November 3, 2017, the Defendant, against the victim B, posted a false statement on the victim B, stating that he/she had access to the Internet at an unspecified place, and sold a beer ticket to “sale” on the Internet, and that he/she had contacted the victim B, stating that he/she would deliver the price of goods to the door-to-door, after confirmation.

However, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to send Mexico so that he did not have any Mexico.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 500,000 won from the company bank account (D) in the name of the defendant under the name of the victim for the sales proceeds of crowdfunding.

[2018 Highest 1316]

1. On November 8, 2017, the Defendant against the victim F posted a letter stating that “Aphone 7 is sold” on the Internet at the “openter” site. The Defendant sent the statement to the victim F, who visited the victim F, “on the part of remittance.”

arrow