logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.11.18 2015나2030648
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning for this case is as follows, except for the addition, modification and deletion as follows, the reasoning for this case is as stated in the column of 1 to 3 of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance. Therefore, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

After the first instance court's 6th 7th 7th 8th 7th 7th 8th 7th 7th 7th 8th "(Supreme Court Decision 2009Da32560 Decided September 24, 2009)", "There is an additional liability" of 7th 12th 7th "(see the above 2009Da32560)", "if the plaintiff is not allowed to have the right to request renewal of the contract for 10 years under the Franchise Business Act, the plaintiff was allowed to have the right to request renewal of the contract for 5th 4th 5th 5th 7th 1st 4th 5th 1st 4th 1st 5th 1st 5th 1st 3th 1st 2014 to 3th 1st 5th 1st 2016)", "the plaintiff's act of changing the right to lease 4th 5th 1st 3th 20th 26th 3th 26th 3rd 2.

arrow