(영문) 서울고등법원 2021.03.11 2020누37996

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울고등법원 2021.03.11 2020누37996

손실보상금

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

The purport of the claim and the appeal shall be 1.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the entry of this case by the court of first instance are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, this is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Each "this Court" of 3 pages 3 of the first instance judgment, 3 pages 3, 13 pages 8, 14 pages 12, 22 pages 2, 3 of the first instance judgment, shall be read as "court of the first instance".

3 - Do 11 - Do 1 - Do 1 - Do 1 - " - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

9 Myeon 9 and 13 Myeon 8 Myeon 13 Myeon 8 "Evaluation Results by Appraiser AK" shall be "part of the Appraisal Results by Appraiser AK".

10 Myeon 18's "Jon around September 2012," "Won around February 2009 and around September 2012, 201."

11 Since Myeon 2's Myeon 11's Myeon 2', it is difficult to conduct 3's Myeon 2'.

The part “ seems to be”.

B. On February 30, 2015, AM sent a certificate to the Plaintiff stating that “the transfer of landscape trees by April 30, 2015 on the ground that the extension of the lease to E land, other than the seven parcels, was not possible,” and I, J, N, etc. presented to the Plaintiff a certificate demanding that “E, K, L,O, U, V, and W land lease contract shall be transferred on the ground that the lease contract for the said land expires on April 30, 2015,” and I, and the J also received rent after the said lease contract from the Plaintiff around June 30, 2016.

In light of the above circumstances, at the time of planting the trees of this case, the Plaintiff had the right to use the land before partitioning, and the right to collect the trees of this case was deemed to have been actually disposed of.

“Aro-friendly”.

19 Myeon 10 shall be added to the following:

"The defendant against this, the amount of the above recognition (175,642 note) shall be prior to the division.

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2007. 9. 5. 선고 2007누2335 판결

-서울고등법원 2019.11.29 2019누49863

-서울고등법원 2007.10.24 2007누4553

-서울고등법원(인천) 2020.01.17 2019나10956

-서울고등법원 2021.04.15 2020누58115