The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The defendant asserts that the summary of the grounds for appeal is unfair because the punishment (two years of suspended execution in six months of imprisonment, and eight hours of social service) declared by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the Defendant recognized his mistake and reflects his mistake, the degree of assault is relatively minor, and there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine.

However, in order to protect the legitimate performance of public duties of the State and to establish a sound social order, the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties requires strict punishment, and the defendant has the record of being punished for the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties around October 2009; the defendant has no record of being punished for the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties; the criminal punishment and equity with regard to other crimes similar to the crime of this case; and other special circumstances or circumstances newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the lower judgment, and there are no changes in the defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive and background of the crime, means and method of the crime; and the circumstances after the crime of this case, it is not recognized that the sentence

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.