A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of traffic Acts on roads;

A. On July 21, 2020, the Defendant: (a) 05:07 around 05:07, while under the influence of alcohol content at 0.115% in blood on the front of the Bel, the Defendant turned down approximately one meter of Crocketing and other vehicles.

B. The Defendant, as described in paragraph 1, is a person who has a record of regulating once as a crime of violating the traffic law (drinking) on the road.

Nevertheless, on July 21, 2020, the Defendant driven the said automobile with alcohol content of 0.059% in an insular section from the Do apartment E-dong parking lot around 09:00 to the front road of the entrance of the said apartment.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a rocketing motor vehicle.

The Defendant driven the above vehicle under the influence of alcohol content 0.059% in blood at the time of the day indicated in paragraph 1-b. At the above time, the Defendant left the front of the entrance of the above apartment at the entrance of the said apartment at the entrance of the department of 1,00,000 left the left at an insular speed.

A person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle is prohibited from driving a motor vehicle in drinking condition, and at the time, Gystna taxi, who drives a road on the road F (F, South, 62 years old) with the victim F (F, South, South) was directly driving from H apartment, and thus, there was a duty of care to safely drive a motor vehicle in order to prevent accidents by driving the motor vehicle in a safe manner by making it possible for him/her to live well.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and did not live well while driving the said vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, and received the parts as fences before the left-hand side of the said taxi by the Defendant’s front-hand part of the said vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury, such as salt, tension, etc., in need of approximately two weeks of treatment by occupational negligence as above.

3. Damage to property;