1. The defendant's "amount of discount" stated in the attached compensation sheet to the plaintiffs shall be as follows: the amount stated in the corresponding part and each of the above money.

Details of the ruling

(a) Project name: H Housing redevelopment and rearrangement project (hereinafter “instant project”);

2) Public announcement of project approval: The defendant: I public announcement in Seo-gu, Daegu Metropolitan City on June 12, 2017, and J 3 of Seo-gu, Daegu Metropolitan City on October 20, 2017:

B. Persons subject to expropriation by the local Land Tribunal of Daegu Metropolitan City on December 28, 2018 (hereinafter “adjudication of expropriation”): Each land and obstacles indicated in the “subject matter of expropriation” in the “subject matter of expropriation” in the “subject matter of compensation in the Seo-gu Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, which owned by the Plaintiffs (hereinafter “each land and obstacles of this case”).

2) The date of commencement of expropriation: K and appraisal corporations: L.

C. Compensation for an objection made by the Central Land Tribunal on August 22, 2019 (hereinafter “Objection”) 1: The same shall apply to the statement in the column for “amount of the objection made” in the attached compensation table (However, since Plaintiff F was dismissed as an objection filed against the adjudication of expropriation, it stated the amount of the adjudication of expropriation.

2) Appraisal Corporation: M. & N.

D. The court’s appraisal of each of the instant lands and obstacles as a result of the court’s entrustment of appraisal to the appraiserO of this Court (hereinafter “court’s appraisal”) is as indicated in the “court’s appraisal result” column of the annexed compensation list.

【Non-contentious facts, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 through 4 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the result of the court's entrustment of appraisal to the appraiser's directors of this court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the plaintiffs' claims

A. The plaintiffs' objection to each of the lands and obstacles of this case and the court's appraisal compensation amount is calculated as below the market price due to the problems of appraisal and thus cannot be deemed reasonable compensation for losses.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiffs additional compensation and damages for delay equivalent to the amount stated in the purport of the claim.

(b).