1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 22,461,250 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from October 20, 2018 to the date of full payment.

1. Details, etc. of ruling;

(a) A project approval and public announcement thereof - Project name: B (small-ro 3-C): - Public announcement of project approval: D-Project operator of the Daegu Metropolitan City on October 30, 2015; Defendant:

B. Adjudication on expropriation by the Regional Land Expropriation Committee of Daegu Metropolitan City on April 5, 2017 - 7 square meters (hereinafter “Eri”) in F-Jari-gun, Daegu (hereinafter “Eri”) subject to expropriation 7 square meters (hereinafter “Seoul”) G G 189 square meters (hereinafter “second land”) - Compensation for expropriation: Total sum of KRW 140,63,850 (see the table below) - From May 16, 2017 - An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation as a large appraisal corporation, a stock company as a limited appraisal corporation.

(c) The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on December 21, 2017 - Compensation for an objection: Total of 141,883,350 won (see the table below) - An appraisal corporation: a dialogue appraisal corporation, a Pacific appraisal corporation, a stock company, and a Pacific appraisal corporation.

D. As a result of the court’s appraisal of H, the adequate value of land Nos. 1 and 2 as of April 5, 2017, which was the date of the court’s appraisal, was assessed as KRW 164,34,600 in total as indicated below:

The unit of amount: 134,171, 170, 135, 333, 450, 457, 157, 387, 050, 143, 883, 350, 350, 164, 224, 600, 200, 234, 135, 3333, 450, 157, 720, 502, 387,050, aggregate of 140,63, 850 141, 883, 350, 350, 344, 6022, 461, and 250 [Ba] The ground for recognition of the appraised amount of compensation for losses

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's claim

A. The plaintiff's assertion, expropriation ruling and compensation for the objection are excessively low in light of transaction prices of other similar lands, such as the utilization status or location of land Nos. 1 and 2.

Therefore, the defendant should pay the plaintiff reasonable compensation for the first and second land.

B. The appraisal results submitted by an appraiser under the entrustment of the court of relevant legal principles through the appraisal process based on professional knowledge and experience are significant in that process.