The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Despite the fact that the Defendant did not have injured the victim G or made a statement to K and M as stated in the judgment with respect to the victim I, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal principles or erroneous determination of facts guilty of this part of the facts charged.

B. Even if a person is found guilty, the sentence of the lower court (hereinafter referred to as a fine of three million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the video image taken by the court below and the court below as to the part of the injury of paragraph (1) of the judgment of misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court below and the trial court. In other words, Kameras who took the scene of a Gap-gun's own office, and together with it, recorded voice, such as "he was done at the time", "Nao", and "a photographing". On the screen immediately after removing the hand, the video screen, which was shown after the removal of the hand, shows that the victim who was seated with the defendant and the victim, was able to be able to tightly cut off from the office seat of the defendant and the victim at the time of the defendant's body, and the victim was removed from the defendant's body and the victim's body at night. Even if the defendant did not directly look at the victim's body at the above video, the victim's body and the victim did not appear to have been disturbed by the defendant and the victim on the day of this case.

Therefore, it is true.