The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is merely the Defendant unilaterally committed to the injured party, and there was no fact that the Defendant, as indicated in the facts charged in this case, was frightened out of the floor by breathing the victim’s breath.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the following circumstances are acknowledged: ① According to CCTV images, the Defendant’s face fating the victim’s fat and drinking in opposition to the victim’s assault, and the Defendant and the victim’s fating and drinking bating the fat, thereby confirming the face of the victim’s face; ② even according to the Defendant’s supplementary appeal statement submitted by his defense counsel, the Defendant recognized the fact that the Defendant fats the victim’s face and fats the victim’s bating and drinking bats. In full view of the following circumstances, it is recognized that the Defendant fats the victim’s bat and fats the victim’s face.

B. On March 20, 2018, after the appeal was not timely filed, the Defendant’s defense counsel asserted that the Defendant had no relation to the Defendant’s assault and injury of the victim, despite the fact that the Defendant satisfling the victim’s face one time in his/her hand, on March 20, 2018.

Even if ex officio, as seen earlier, the Defendant assaulted the victim, and the victim was diagnosed as “the left-hand confluored with 5 dried scarcitys, scarbed with scarcitys, scarbed with scarbs, scarbed with scarbs, and with scarbs,” and the victim was consistently stated in the investigative agency and court of the court below to the effect that the victim was plucked and plucked by the victim’s fingers during the process, it is recognized that the victim was injured by the Defendant’s assault and assault by the victim, such as the alteration of 5 scarbs on the left-hand side.

3. If so, the defendant-appellant.