beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2017 Highest 284] Defendant, on May 2015, 201, to the victim B at a non-fash-dong, Ulsan-gu, U.S. Non-dong (U.S.) location, “I want to open a house on the land, and I will lend money within 2-3 months from the loan of the opening of a house.
“.....”
However, the defendant was thought to use money as an Internet gambling by lending money from the damaged person as a business fund at the time, while there was no particular property or income, but even if he borrowed money from the damaged person in excess of KRW 40 million, he did not have the intention or ability to repay the money.
The Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) received KRW 10 million from the victim on May 20, 2015 to the Korean bank account of the Defendant at a place where it is difficult to know the place around May 20, 2015 from the victim; (c) received KRW 7 million from the same account on June 29, 2015, respectively; and (d) received KRW 19 million in cash at a place where it is impossible to identify the place where the police officer cannot know, and received KRW 2 million in cash.
"2017 Highest 965"
1. On June 10, 2015, the Defendant forged private documents without authority for the purpose of exercising it at the “D” restaurant located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, but written the application form in the name of “E”, “D located in the Nam-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, and the mobile phone number column for the Defendant’s cell phone number column, and written the application form in the manner of signing in the name of E.
Accordingly, the Defendant forged the above credit card subscription application form in the name of E, a private document on rights and obligations.
2. The Defendant, like the above 1. Paragraph 1., submitted the forged application to the employees of the above credit card company as if it were the duly formed document and exercised one copy of the forged application form.
3. The Defendant is pretending to be one of the instant methods, and the Victim Card Co., Ltd. is the victim.