logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2019.01.31 2018나55484
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal and the claims extended by this court are dismissed, respectively.

2. This is due to the extension of claims for the costs of appeal.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The occurrence of desolate river site 1) Defendant Gyeongnam-do carried out a field investigation in around 2008 to establish a river maintenance master plan, including Hanyang-si, a local river, and accordingly, prepared a “HB Icheon Basic River Plan report” around October 2008. The above report entered into the “1951 river plan (the 1959 river was landed on the Korean Peninsula around September 1959, because the 1959 river was landed in the Korean Peninsula) in 1951 (the 1959 river was landed) and the river was originally used as a private ground after the river was buried and repaired by residents in the river basin.” Defendant Gyeongnam-do was incorporated into a river with the entire content of the river maintenance plan, namely, the entire part of the land owned by the Plaintiff Gyeongyang-do and the entire part of the land owned by the Plaintiff Y-do without being buried into the river and the entire part of the land owned by the Plaintiff YJ-do.

3) On September 25, 2009, the Plaintiff filed a civil petition on September 25, 2009, stating that “the land owned by the Plaintiff, which is currently used as the current river, is restored to the original river, and the part of the abandoned river is used as the river.” On the same day, the Plaintiff was in charge of the O and the chief, etc. on the same day, the land category of the instant land owned by the Plaintiff was changed to a river on January 30, 2009; on January 25, 2010, the land category of the instant land owned by the Plaintiff was changed to a river; and on January 25, 2010, the P paddy-si 303 square meters from the land on the F, and Qua 682 square meters from the J land

(2) The Plaintiff’s land (hereinafter “the Plaintiff’s land”). (5) The Defendant is the Plaintiff’s land located in the Nanyang-si (hereinafter “instant desolate river site”) on January 18, 2010, in total, of the 96 square meters in Seoyang-si C, 303 square meters in P, Q, Q, 682 square meters (hereinafter “instant desolate river site”).

A divided B. On February 11, 2010, the smuggling market was divided, and the desolate river site of this case is as follows RR.

arrow