A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 23, 2017, the Defendant voluntarily accompanied the police station C police box of the previous U.S. police station by a police officer who was dispatched after receiving a report while carrying the workplace guard fee and wrapping it at the time B at the time of the previous Si/S. on June 23, 2017

Around that time, the Defendant got a telephone from the Defendant’s wife by a telephone for public use in a police box at that time, and was laid in a crypt, and his cell phone does not operate while waiting to sit in a chair.

In the event that a police officer who was carrying out a port was able to take a cell phone while carrying out a bath called “Seman frie” to the police officer who was employed by the police box, and continued to have him returned to Korea from E by the police officer who was employed by the police box, he was able to carry the chest in hand by hand, and carried out a flabing flab by hand following his hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of E pertaining to the handling of reported cases and the protection of police boxes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each field photograph, internal investigation report (which shall be limited to the act of a police box first for the person suspected of being accused), recording, record of handling of a report 112, record of handling of a case, investigation report (which shall be accompanied by a photograph of a police officer who is sealed by the person suspected

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on February 11, 2015, by taking full account of the following circumstances: (a) the two-year period of suspension of the execution of official duties has been sentenced to imprisonment for a period of six months on February 11, 2015; (b) the degree of interference with the performance of official duties; (c) the details of the crime; (d) the circumstances after the crime