A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and a fine for 200,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Punishment of the crime

1. When any police officer requests a driver to present his/her driver's license or asks questions to confirm his/her identity and driver's license in order to ensure the traffic safety or to maintain traffic order while driving a vehicle, drivers of the Road Traffic Act shall comply with

Nevertheless, on June 14, 2015, the Defendant driven a motor bicycle “B” on or around 17:30 on June 14, 2015, and, on the street in front of 737, the Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu distributiondong, to the road of Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and sought a driver’s license from a police officer affiliated with the police station of Gangnam-gu Police Station, who discovered the use of the central line, to 165 on the street, and refused to present the driver’

2. At the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph of the obstruction of performance of official duties, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender in violation of the Road Traffic Act by the police officers D, etc., and was arrested by the above police officers D in the course of boarding the patrol vehicle, and the chest and shoulder part of the above D's chests and shoulder part of the defendant's arms and shoulder part of the police uniforms in hand, and when the police uniforms in the above D's uniforms were removed by hand, and when the head of the police box where the police box supported by the above police officers E met the chest part of the E.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of traffic order and public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. The defendant asserts that there was no assault by police officers on the spot and on-site photographs of the victim police officers, copies of a notification of payment of penalty (related to the central line intrusion), a letter of fidelity guarantee, each investigation report, and a report on the investigation results.

In full view of the evidence duly adopted and examined in this court, the damaged police officer only stated that the police officer was damaged by the defendant, and the statement about the defendant's act, damage, and situation before and after the crime is specific.