logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.05.24 2016고단4171
사문서위조등
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The facts charged [Basic Facts] The Defendant is the operator of a restaurant “H” on the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 1’s G1, and as an employee of the above restaurant, he was investigated by an investigative agency because he did not timely pay the retirement allowance of the I retired employee of the above restaurant, and the I did not receive the full payment of the retirement allowance.

In order to maintain a false statement, the author tried to arbitrarily forge and submit to the investigation agency two copies of the confirmation document prepared in the name of I, such as “Written Confirmation of December 10, 2014” and “Written Confirmation of October 21, 2014,” which entered as if I received the full amount of wages including retirement pay at the time of retirement, and “Written Confirmation of October 21, 2014,” which entered as if I had received a false statement from the Defendant and prepared a direct confirmation document.

[Criminal facts]

1. The act of forging a private document related to “self-certification on December 10, 2014” and the act of uttering of a falsified document

A. The Defendant confirmed that he was paid the full amount of wages he had worked in H, using the computer in blank at the closed location of the date in the name of the date;

On December 10, 2014, the name: I, point I: A, written “A”, and written “I” on the name side of I using a black pen.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of confirmation in the name of I, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

B. On June 19, 2015, the Defendant, at the Seoul Southern District Public Prosecutor’s Office located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Southern District Public Prosecutor’s Office located in 390, exercised one copy of the forged confirmation as described in the preceding paragraph to the Prosecutor’s Assistant K, who knew of the forgery.

2. The act of forging a private document related to “self-certification of October 21, 2014” and the act of uttering of a falsified document

A. The Defendant confirmed that “I have received 500,000 won temporarily” in blank using the computer at the closed location of the date in the name of the date;

On October 21, 2014, name: Shall be indicated as “A” and the head of the point shall be followed by the person in question using a shot pension.

arrow