logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.04.05 2018고단378
상해
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for three months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 50,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A around 07:00 on January 29, 2018, at the E main station located in Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, for the reason that the conversation was divided with the victim B (42 taxes) and then the victim’s reconcilation was carried out on the ground that the victim’s reconcilation was carried out with a prone mark. Defendant A saw that the victim’s reconcilation was carried out in front of the aforementioned E main shop, and she dump the victim’s breathum, and she dump was dump that requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. Defendant B: (a) at the time, at the place, and at the time, at the above paragraph (1) above; (b) at the victim A (54) in this case, floated the victim’s float; (c) floated the victim’s float; and (d) floated the victim’s float; and (d) floated the victim’s b

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. A written statement;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each damaged photograph;

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (elective of imprisonment): Defendant B: Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (elective of penalty)

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act on the confinement of a workhouse (Defendant B);

1. The suspended sentence (Defendant A) comprehensively takes into account the following circumstances and other conditions of sentencing as stated in the records of the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, and determines the sentence as ordered.

Defendants A and Defendant B do not want to punish each other by mutual consent, and they are against each other: Defendant B and there is no record of exceeding the fine together with the fact that there are the same kind of records of several meetings.

arrow