logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.06.30 2017고단609
폭행등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,00, KRW 100, KRW 100,000, KRW 1,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On December 17, 2016, at around 03:25, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the Defendant with Defendant B while working in front of the “E” Ma, which was in a parallel and distressed on the street in front of the Mancheon-si, South Mancheon-si; (b) obstructed the Defendant’s chest part of the said victim’s chest by hand on the ground that the Defendant and B were fighting between the Defendant and the Defendant.

B. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, and at the place specified in the preceding paragraph, carried and pushed down b with the victim C (23 tax) who was the act in the above B, and carried breath, on the ground that the said victim dumbeded and dumpeded his fat, asked the above victim’s left hand hand hand hand over, thereby holding the said victim’s hand over 2 weeks medical treatment.

2. Defendant B and Defendant C set up against the act of the victim A (22 tax) as described in the above paragraph (1) at the time, time, and place mentioned in the above paragraph (1) at the same time, and at the same time, Defendant B spited the face of the above victim and pushed down the above victim by spitation, hand, and pushed down the bat of the above victim. Defendant C, by hand, took the bat of the bat of the above victim’s bat, and fatd the face of the above victim at one time.

As a result, the defendants jointly put about about three weeks of medical treatment to the above victims, such as the left-hand side of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Articles 257(1), 260(1), and 260(1) of the Criminal Act; selection of fines

B. Defendant B and C: Article 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act; Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; selection of each fine

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, each of the Defendants’ detention in a workhouse

1. The reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are as follows: (a) all the Defendants do not have the same kind of criminal records, age, reflect, and not want to be punished against each other.

arrow