A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

【The Defendant was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Seoul High Court on August 29, 2014, and on June 8, 2016, the same criminal records including the completion of the execution of the above sentence in the astronomical Prison on June 8, 2016 are six persons.

【Criminal facts of the Defendant, at around 10:30 on April 1, 2017, the first floor of the “D Hospital” located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, who was hospitalized in the above hospital prior to the Defendant’s discharge from the Defendant’s discharge due to an absence of permission, etc., on the following grounds: (a) the victim E (45) who was the chief of the above hospital’s office, the head of the above hospital’s office; (b) the Defendant was not released from the Defendant’s office due to the absence of any fribs, fribs, and fribs, from whom the fribs were released.

A. The discharge of his son, who was on the one hand, would take a bath on the other, which is the larger 90 minutes of the instant hospital’s second floor examination room, and the son was able to take a bath as above, and the said son was able to take a bath on the other hand, again make the first floor, keep the second floor, and take a bath, thereby hindering the management work of the victim’s hospital by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of witness E in the fourth public trial protocol;

1. Statement made by the witness F in the 12-time trial record;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Previous Records: The defendant asserts to the effect that the illegality of the defendant's behavior is excluded since he/she properly resisted against such unlawful measures by forcing him/her to be hospitalized in his/her mental ward in his/her hospital, such as a response to inquiries such as criminal history, sentence, etc., investigation report (verification of repeated crimes), and personal confinement status (the defendant's act is against the law by forcing him/

(1) However, when the defendant was under investigation of this case and made a statement, the hospital resisted him to be forced to discharge him from the hospital.

The defendant only made a statement, and did not mention the hospitalization in the mental ward, and ② according to the response of the fact to the head of the D Hospital in this court, the defendant was hospitalized in the general hospital room by getting 119 as a strong wife, and the defendant was hospitalized in the general hospital.