Defendants shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 21, 2017, around 02:00, Defendant A, at the E parking lot located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, expressed a parking ticket, and Defendant A expressed a bath theory, such as “the flap, Chewing, and the aging and aging of this dog,” and assaulted by his hand the victim’s flab and flap.

2. Defendant B, upon receipt of the report that the assault case occurred at the time and place described in the above 1.1. At the time and place described in the above 1. paragraph, Defendant B attempted to identify the personal information and the circumstances of the case to H, a police officer belonging to the G police unit of the branch police station G police station G, the police officer of the branch police station, and attempted to identify Defendant B’s personal information and the circumstances of the case to H; and

The 112 police officers' legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports, etc., such as h's bath, h's shoulder, h's shoulder, h's shoulder, etc., was obstructed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made with H and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes by cutting CCTV images into the Republic of Korea;

1. Defendant A of the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act concerning the crime: Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act

1. The choice of punishment (the Defendants) is a set of punishment (the crimes committed during the period of suspended execution and the crimes committed against the elderly and police officers are not good.

However, considering the fact that the degree of violence of the Defendants is relatively minor due to the breathing of breath or shouldering, and that all the Defendants mislead and repent, even if they choose a fine, the effect of punishment against the Defendants would be expected if they are punished by a fine, and that it would be somewhat harsh to generate the result of the invalidation of the previous suspended sentence by selecting imprisonment and sentenceing imprisonment.

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act on the confinement of the workhouse (defendants)

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act