logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 남원지원 2016.10.04 2016고단139
특수협박등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months and by a fine not exceeding 700,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2016 Highest 139] The Defendant is a person who operated a cosmetic store with the trade name “D” in Namwon-si, and the victim E (n, 55 years old) is a person who operates a cosmetic store with the trade name “F” in the building of the above store of the Defendant.

The Defendant, while operating the above cosmetic, installed a large number of strings outside of the store, installed a large stringer, and operated a business, and reported by neighboring merchants and dispatched by police officers, etc. In a serious conflict relationship with the above cosmetics. However, the victim, who heard that the merchants completed the above cosmetics by jointly signing on the noise damage, was able to make the above cosmetics, and the victim was able to have been able to see the victim.

1. At around 17:30 on July 6, 2016, the Defendant: (a) mistakend the victim as leading the preparation of the above application within the clothes “F”; (b) misunderstanding the victim as leading the preparation of the above application; and (c) misunderstanding that the victim was a police officer of the four-year period of music; (d) her husband and her husband is also aware that the victim was a police officer of the four-year period of music; (e) the victim reported 112 and sent the victim to the scene; and (e) the police officer sent the scene at the scene, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s clothes by force for 15 minutes of the victim’s clothes, such as her husband and her husband, and her husband, her husband, who took a heavy bath with the large voice.

2. A special intimidation: (a) around August 6, 2016, the Defendant was able to play music with the above spacker and received a claim by telephone from the spacker; and (b) the Defendant thought that the said spacker was the victim and was dissatisfied with the complaint against the victim.

On August 7, 2016, the Defendant opened a store entrance outside of the above F Burial and “the victim shall be able to leave the store out of the mother’s child and Chewing.”

arrow