The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal did not interfere with duties, such as raising disturbances at male clothing stores, as stated in the facts charged in the instant case.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the judgment of the court below and the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, namely, the statement of victim E and witness G and the defendant arrested the defendant as the current offender on the day of the instant case, the defendant is acknowledged to have obstructed the store business by force for about 20 minutes in the clothing store of the victimized person as stated in the facts constituting the crime of the court below.

① The victim E was unable to resist the Defendant’s demand that the Defendant refund the strings repaired at the Defendant’s request on two occasions at the male clothing store in his/her work department room, and demanded that the Defendant refund the strings within the strings, and that he/she gets a large amount of sound for about twenty minutes. Accordingly, other customers could not enter the said store.

was stated.

② Gdo managing a male clothing store, the Defendant called that he was suffering from disturbance as above and went to the above store, and the Defendant would not have any way until the Defendant returned the repaired Shirts.

1.2 1.3 1. 1. 1.

The statement is consistent with the above victim's statement.

③ Even after hearing the explanation that the Defendant could not refund, the Defendant continued to demand the refund of the repaired stacks. Ultimately, the Defendant, along with the said employees, moved to the customer counseling room in the store. In addition, the customer counseling room was off, and the Defendant was off from the customer counseling room, demanded the refund, and complied with the withdrawal, and the police officer was called out. ④ The Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender suspected of interfering with the duty, even after the dispatch of the police officer.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.