Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2013 High 1007" is a person who drives a shower car.

On May 4, 2013, around 005:15, the blood alcohol concentration was not indicated in the blood alcohol concentration, and the shipping Daegu C was driven by approximately 300 meters from the street corner in front of the convenience store located in the same Dong to the E-Moel parking lot located in the same Dong.

However, F and the defendant, the main business owner of the above EMel, came to run for the problem of accommodation charges, and F reported the defendant as drinking driving.

Accordingly, it became possible to confirm whether the defendant is driving under the influence of alcohol.

The CCTV installed in the above E-Moel confirmed that the surface of the vehicle that the defendant gets into the inn part of the entrance outside of the entrance was recorded and confirmed, the defendant's entrance was snickly snicked, the defendant's body was inaccurate, and the body was not properly accumulated, and there are reasonable grounds to suspect that the driver was driving a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, such as 06:31, 06:43, 06:54, 07:05 on the same day, and it was refused to take a drinking test as a drinking measuring instrument on four occasions, but without good cause.

around 05:20 on May 4, 2013, the Defendant: (a) requested the victim to reduce accommodation charges, but refused the request, and (b) caused the victim to suffer the injury that the victim incurred due to the debrising debrising debrising on the elevator, spit the victim’s spitation “flabing,” and the victim flabsing on the elevator, flabing the flabing of the victim’s flabing, and flabing the flabing of the victim’s face by drinking and flabing the flabing of the victim’s face, walking on the face of the victim’s face due to drinking and flabing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a report on the statement of the situation of a prime driver, investigation report-to attaching CCTV images;

1. The injury under Article 148-2 (1) 2, Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of sound driving) and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act to a criminal facts;