A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 21:00 on February 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) sought from the victim C (the 31-year-old), who was in the So-gu So-gu So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called "pro-young damage" at the D key point in the operation of the victim C (the 31-year-old) in So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called "pro-younging damage; (b) the Defendant was in a timely fashion to the victim; (c) he was booming the beer and so-called beer to the victim, who was a dangerous object on the mebble; and (d) assaulted the victim by using her buck cherthm and flabing b

2. On February 25, 2014, between 21:10 and 21:50 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s general restaurant operation by force, such as avoiding disturbance, such as taking alcohol in the above place, and allowing customers in the above heading house to leave as they are, thereby obstructing the victim’s general restaurant operation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Considerations, etc. agreed with the victim);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( repeatedly considering the aforementioned circumstances);