A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

Around 20:40 on May 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) d restaurant located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, expressed the victim E (the 19-year-old-old-old-year-old-year-old-year-old-old-old-gu-gu-si (hereinafter referred to as “ophing-out ring-out sing-out singing-out sing-out sing-out sing-outing-out sing-outing-out sing-outing-out sing-outing-out sing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-out sing-outing-outing-outing-out-outing-out-outing-outing-outing-outing-out.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim jointly with the person who was not injured by his name.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Application of the prosecution examination protocol to the accused;

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 2 (2) and (1) 1 of the Criminal Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation, conviction under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, and reasons for sentencing;

1. Although the victim E’s legal statement and the witness F’s legal statement for conviction are partially inconsistent with each other in the detailed part concerning the circumstances, the statement is generally made to the effect that it conforms to the facts charged, and its credibility is consistent with the investigation agency’s consistent statement from this court to this court.

On the other hand, G’s legal statement at the time of restaurant is difficult to believe it is in the light of the relationship with the Defendant, which is a son, or the attitude of the testimony in the court.

Defendant

In addition, in the prosecutor's office, the facts charged in the instant case were recognized, and in light of the specific contents of the statement or the circumstances before and after, the prosecutor's statement is more than the contents of the defendant's statement in the court to the effect that the time of fighting had been