1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendant are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs are children of the network E (hereinafter “the deceased”), and the Defendant is the operator of the Seodaemun-gu Seoul Seomun-gu New Generation School Symnae Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

B. On June 10, 2015, the Deceased was issued a written request for a close inspection on the ground that he/she continues to engage in oral and bathing treatment under the name of disease, such as “finite-finite disease accompanied by food infection,” etc. in Nonparty F’s internal department, and “a detailed unknown water surface disorder,” etc.

C. On June 10, 2015, the Deceased was admitted to the Defendant Hospital after receiving G’s medical treatment. From June 11, 2015 to June 13, 2015, the Deceased complained of symptoms, such as mental and physical diagnosis, CT inspection, PE-CT inspection, and surface inspection, and he/she complained of the symptoms, such as clothes, frying, breast answers, etc., which were unsatisfyed and unsatisfyed and unsatched with unsatisfying.

On the other hand, the deceased tried to undergo a diversary surgery for tissue inspection as doubtful cancer, etc. (the scheduled date on June 15, 2015), and on June 13, 2015, the deceased moved to the diversary ward.

On June 14, 2015, the Deceased was the director four times for the scheduled surgery. On June 14, 2015, the Deceased complained of the acute pain pain and was subject to the earthquake control, etc., and was exempted from the water around 23:20.

On June 15, 2015, the Deceased was suspended from beer and cardiopulmonary resuscitation around 03:25, but was killed in crypology (beer) at around 04:25, 04:25.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entries in Gap evidence 1 through 6 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The summary of the plaintiffs' cause of action was unreasonable in light of the condition of the deceased before the death of the deceased, and as the deceased complained of extreme pain, the defendant hospital administered the control of narcotics on five occasions during a short period of time. The deceased died of the respiratory suppression and heart suspension due to the extinguishment control.

On the other hand.