1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

1. Basic facts

A. The deceased C (D students, hereinafter “the deceased”) is a patient who died after receiving medical treatment at the E Hospital operated by the Defendant in Busan Young-gu (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”). The Plaintiff is the deceased’s infant.

B. On September 26, 2013, around 08:13, the Deceased appealed to the emergency room of the Defendant Hospital, and the medical team of the Defendant Hospital reported the deceased’s x-ray test and diagnosed that the director needs to take, and administered the glycerine through two times of work around 08:31 and around 09:00 on the same day.

C. Around 10:00 on September 26, 2013, the medical team at Defendant Hospital: (a) inspected EXE-ray shooting and conducted blood tests on the deceased; (b) thereafter, for the purpose of the management, the medical team at Defendant Hospital administered the head of the area through the work.

As the deceased continuously complained of the clothes, on September 16, 2013, at around 16:00, the Defendant Hospital medical personnel inspected the part of the clothes to the deceased, etc. As a result, the air (Freeir) favorable to the uniforms was diagnosed as a pan-patitis caused by the Sacheon-ro, and the first operation was performed against the deceased from around 17:45 of the same day to around 01:20 of the same day, such as Harman’s diversing.

E. After the first operation, the Deceased was under medical treatment in the Defendant Hospital’s middle-patient, but at the time of October 14, 2013, green products due to creativity were seen. On October 15, 2013, the Defendant Hospital medical personnel performed the second operation with respect to the Deceased on the part of the Deceased.

F. On October 16, 2013, the Deceased died due to a astronomical hole on the 08:13th of October 2013, 2013, a parodial transfusion from patum infection, and a cardiopulmonary suspension due to multi-long-term corrosion.

G. As the deceased’s heir, the Plaintiff and the deceased were children, and the deceased F was dead on February 2, 2014, and the deceased was a siblings.

[Grounds for Recognition] Unsured Facts, including Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, and 6, and hereinafter the number.