logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.11.25 2014가단238839
손해배상(의)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On December 10, 2012, Plaintiff A (G) received hospitalized treatment at a powder hospital due to the outbreak of acute cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral typhism. From January 8, 2013, Plaintiff A (G) received hospitalized treatment by transferring the symptoms to H hospital, which is a specialized hospital for the elderly at home, around his/her home, from January 8, 2013. On August 24, 2013, Plaintiff A (G) started to receive hospitalized treatment by transferring the shock symptoms to the obsian sulpha hospital on the same day.

B. The plaintiff A was in the left-hand paralysis due to brain flachi, so his family members employed I (J) as nursing workers, and let the plaintiff A look back from the 24-hour side.

At around 06:30 on September 9, 2013, in the course that Plaintiff A her body was cut off with a labing-out and patient clothes, Plaintiff A was unable to maintain a balance of body and his head was faced with the string of a rail (hereinafter “accident in this case”), which led to the occurrence of an accident that Plaintiff A was faced with the string of a rail (hereinafter “the accident in this case”), and the medical personnel performed an emergency 1:50 on the same day.

C. The annual household of the Defendant educational foundation is a juristic person that establishes and operates the prime Synasium hospital. Defendant E and F are the prime Synasium nurse, and the assistant nurse, who was in charge of the 36-dong unit of the prime Synasium hospital 36-dong unit of the Plaintiff at the time of the instant abortion accident.

Plaintiff

B, C, and D are children of Plaintiff A.

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 10, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination of the parties' arguments

가. 당사자들의 주장 요지 ⑴ 원고들의 주장 사고 당일 04:30경부터 원고 A이 잠을 자지 못하고 침대의 난간을 흔들면서 소리를 지르는 섬망(妄) 증상을 보여, 간병인 I가 당직 간호사였던 피고 E, F에게 원고 A의 상태를 알렸음에도, 피고 E, F이 원고 A을 진정시키기 위한 아무런 조치를 취하지 않았고, 간병인 I...

arrow