(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.11.09 2017고단3138

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.11.09 2017고단3138

업무방해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 00:30 on June 1, 2017, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s main business by force for about 30 minutes from the time when 30 minutes of the disturbance was caused by the victim’s desire to “the same son with a bit of bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a

2. The Defendant, who did not comply with the above request from the victim D to leave the above date, time, place, and the victim's 112 report, demanded the victim to leave the victim even after the arrival of the police, but failed to leave the police for 30 minutes as above without any justifiable reason.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and F;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. 112 Notification to a department related to the report of the case;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 319(2) of the Criminal Act, and Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act, and selection of fines for the crime;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, including that the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution as a result of interference with his/her business on June 29, 2015, and the Defendant committed the same violent crime during the suspended execution period, and denies some of the crimes; however, the Defendant was committed during the suspended execution period; however, the degree of interference is not severe; the Defendant was presumed to have committed a crime by interesting in the state of full occurrence; and the victim did not want to be punished against the Defendant.

참조조문

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.10 2017고정3375

-수원지방법원 2017.09.20 2017고단3729

-창원지방법원 진주지원 2017.01.19 2016고정339

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.12.19 2018고단3102

-청주지방법원 2018.05.08 2016고단2947