logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.10 2017고정3375
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From April 19, 2017 to April 16:30 to 18:00, the Defendant’s interference with business: (a) at the customer counseling room for the second floor of the C Hospital; (b) on the ground that the Defendant demanded the issuance of a written diagnosis of the disabled; (c) on the ground that the Defendant could not be issued by the hospital, the Defendant’s demand for the issuance of the written diagnosis of the disabled; (d) the age and age of the victim D working in the above counseling room was the year; (c) the year after the end of the year; and (d) the victim E working in the same office; and (c) whether the victim E “I will go to the health and welfare department for the first year of the year, N. L.

“Along with sound, customers who find the above counseling room for about one hour and 30 minutes of the disturbance were unable to receive counseling services normally, thereby obstructing the victims’ counseling services by force.

2. On April 19, 2017, from around 18:00 to around 20:10, the Defendant refused to withdraw from C Hospital’s customer counseling center at the second floor of C Hospital’s main office as described in paragraph 1, even if he/she received a request from C Hospital staff members F to complete the customer center’s business hours, and he/she did not comply with the request even if he/she received several requests from C Hospital staff members F to change the hours of the customer center. On the same day, the police officer’s desire and highness after being dispatched, and the police officer’s arrest at around 20:10 on the same day until he/she is arrested as a flagrant offender, and the Defendant did not leave C Hospital’s customer center for about 2 hours and 10 minutes until he/she is arrested by

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Investigation report (to telephone conversations with witnesses);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing evidence photographs;

1. Articles 314(1) and 313 (Interference with Business) of the Criminal Act and Article 319(2) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow