1. Of one-story resting restaurants, 76.38 square meters and one-story general restaurants, 40.66 square meters in the attached list, real estate;

A. Defendant A.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On January 27, 2016, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the 1,556.8m2 (hereinafter “instant land”).

B. D completed the registration of ownership transfer on the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant building”) on March 8, 201, and the instant building is constructed on the instant land and its adjacent land.

C. However, D has divided or leased the instant building to the Defendants. Of 76.38 square meters and general restaurants of 40.66 square meters on the first floor of the instant building; Defendant A has connected 3,34, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, and 33 points in sequence; 29.1 square meters on the ship; 35, 36, 58, 59, 36, 59, 35; 36.4 square meters in order of 12.9 square meters; 32, 332, 54, 65, 666, and 32 square meters in order of 6.4 square meters; 16.3 square meters in each part of the instant building; 36.4 square meters in each of the aforementioned 6.3 square meters in each of the aforementioned 6.3 square meters in each of the aforementioned drawings; 46.36.36,75,75, and 322

On the other hand, the trial was conducted on the title of the instant building to occupy the instant land. On July 20, 2017, this court rendered a judgment (2015Na10267) that included the following: “D shall remove the part of the instant building that occupied the instant land and deliver the said part of the instant building to the Plaintiff; and D appealed appealed, but the judgment was dismissed on October 31 of the same year.

recognized.