beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
At around 01:53 on May 26, 2020, the Defendant: (a) 112 was under the influence of alcohol at the C convenience store located in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon; and (b) she was requested to voluntarily return home from E, a police official belonging to the Daejeon District Police Station Dental Police Station, who was called to the scene after receiving a report of 112; and (c) she b her b her b b b her b b her b b b shes, and she her b shes b her b shes b her b shes, and even after the convenience point was left, she she she she she takes a b b herb b her b b her b b b she she she she she was under the influence of her driver’s seat; and (d) she she b she she b shes her face with the b b her face.
Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the prevention, suppression, investigation, etc. of crimes.
Summary of Evidence
1. Protocol of each police statement of the defendant E in court and F;
1. A statement prepared by the F;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to capture photographs by major situation of the video;
1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence is that the police officer, upon receiving a report, expressed a desire to the police officer and assaulted the police officer to commit the crime. However, the degree of the assault in this case is not limited, and the defendant has no record of punishment for violent crimes except for the punishment of a fine of KRW 700,000 as a result of the violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act in 198. The defendant deposited KRW 50,000 in the E police officer and F. The police officer wanted to take the action against the defendant, and the police officer E wanted to take account of the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and procedure of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc.