1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as follows, and the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that for the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the parts written or added in the following cases. Thus, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article

[Supplementary or added parts] The "No. 42" and "No. 2" shall be added to "No. 42" and "No. 42" in Part 7 of Part 4.

Part 6 of the 13th page "A light, etc. being taken by comparison" shall be applied to "a light, if necessary, using the fingerprints verification system."

The first and second forms of “The fact that the Plaintiff did not review it, or did not directly visit the said real estate,” shall be read as “the fact that it did not review it.” Then, the lower court examined the loan of this case for the purpose of initial investment funds of the said Corporation on March 19, 2012 (see evidence 14), 5 the Plaintiff’s written contract for the construction work (Evidence 27-6), which was submitted by D, etc., on March 20, 2012, the date of its preparation was 20% after the date of its credit review. The date of commencement of construction work was 1 November 201, 2012, and it was difficult for the Plaintiff to submit the said written contract for construction work, 30% of the initial date of construction work, 200 million won, and 30% of the said written contract for construction work, 30% of the said written contract for construction work.