A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 17, 2017, around 23:55, at the “C” restaurant located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, 2017, the Defendant: (a) investigated the details of the report by the superintendent of the police station D police box affiliated with the police station D police box, who was called after being reported by 112 by the principal of the restaurant business, wherein customers scam a scam; and (b) recommended the Defendant to return to the Republic of Korea; (c) made a scambl with the hand floor of the police officer at one time, and scambling the chest part.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports by police officers, maintenance of order, prevention of crimes, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of statutes governing the place of work;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 201Do141, Apr. 1, 2011>