A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 20, 2016, at around 19:25, the Defendant: (a) instructed the police officer to stop the business of the above restaurant while investigating the circumstances surrounding E belonging to the D District Team of the Daegu Police Station, and the background of the police officer’s report, etc., on September 20, 2016, the Defendant: (b) assaulted the police officer E’s bridge and E’s gypt part of the private road; and (c) assaulted the police officer of the F on a one-time level the upper part of the police officer’s left top part of the B, while taking a bath to the police officer; and (d) assaulting the police officer of the F on a one-time basis.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports and maintenance of order, crime prevention, etc. by the above police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 62 (1)