logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.01.11 2018고정1662
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates a sexual traffic business with the trade name called "D on the Internet" in Suwon-si B 3th floor C.

No act of similarity shall be arranged using part of body, such as sexual intercourse, hand or mouth, in return for receiving or promising to receive money, valuables or other benefits from an unspecified person.

Nevertheless, from October 208 to October 21:20 of the same year, the defendant had 14 rooms in Suwon-si B B 3rd floor C, 8 rooms in shower rooms and two female employees E (50 years of age), including 'D', in the name of "D", and reported female employees E (50 years of age), 'Internet site', 'G', 'D', and so on, from October 2014 to October 21:20 of the same year, the defendant arranged to provide a course (30 minutes of gender, gender relationship), BS (1 hour, gender relationship) 140,000 won by attracting unspecified male descendants who agreed to report it to his/her business place, and provided a service 'the 'the 'the 'the 'the 'sex relationship' to female employees'.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of E and I;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Investigation report by the public prosecutor (the analysis report on the results of a part-time analysis)

1. Application of respective existing Acts and subordinate statutes of subparagraphs 1 through 4 of this Article;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of a fine concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act regarding the order of provisional payment is that the business of arranging sexual traffic is harmful to the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing the sex, and thus, it is necessary to strictly punish the sexual traffic because of the lack of social harm.

The crime of this case is not appropriate in light of the period of crime or the scale of business, and the defendant seems to have suffered considerable benefit from the crime.

In the above circumstances, the defendant's age, character, character and environment, and age.

arrow