Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On October 6, 2014, the Defendant: (a) placed two female employees D, etc. on the condition that they would be 25,000 to 30,000 won per course through ‘C’ with 7 rooms, beds and other facilities in Suwon-si B (4th floor); (b) placed an advertisement in Internet site, 'E', 'F', and 'G' on the condition that they would be similar to those of female employees; and (c) arranged commercial sex acts, such as arranging commercial sex acts, such as arranging commercial sex acts, such as arranging them from the sexual traffic descendants who had found them to 40,000 won, 15 minutes, BF(15 minutes, handbath, 15 minutes), and 45,000 won, from October 6, 2014 to 3010:50 of the same month.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of H and D;
1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor concerning facts constituting an offense;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);
1. Probation, order to provide community service and attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;
1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;
1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: One month to seven years of imprisonment;
2. The scope of the sentencing guidelines for sentencing [decision of types] the basic area of the arrangement of commercial sex acts (decision of the recommended area and the scope of the recommended punishment] by sexual traffic crime group-business, etc. (no special person shall be punished for six months to one year):
3. The sentence shall be determined as ordered within the scope of the recommended sentence, taking into account the fact that the Defendant’s decision of sentencing is divided, and that it is the first offender who has no criminal power for punishment, etc.