logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2017.03.24 2016고단1631
절도등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A theft Defendant: (a) around 03:30 on June 19, 2016, at “C” located in “C”; (b) around 03:30 on the part of the victim, the victim D, who was a customer of his/her place, was suffering from a crepit in a cresh in the victim’s wall; and (c) committed theft with one unsatis in the market price bearing the Nong Bank’s physical card owned by the victim.

2. On June 19, 2016, the Defendant would pay the drinking value to the Victim G, the proprietor of the business, at the point of “F” located in E at F in F on June 19, 2016, around 04:51.

At the same time, as stated in Paragraph 1, it presented the following facts: (a) by means of settling the price of KRW 2.50,000, the victim was deceiving the victim by means of deceptioning the victim and receiving the victim from the victim, but (b) immediately cancelled the settlement of the card and used the stolen debit card on the wind that does not drink at the above main point.

3. On June 19, 2016, the Defendant in violation of the Act on Financial Business Specializing in Fraud and Credit-based Financial Business pays the alcohol value to the victim I who is the owner of the business at the H “H” located in B at Fapo-si on June 19, 2016.

At the same time, as stated in Paragraph 1, I suggested that the e-mail card owned by the No. Do, which was stolen, was properly used, and, by paying the price of KRW 200,000,00, deceiving the victim by deceiving the victim, acquiring economic benefits equivalent to the amount of the e-mail and using the stolen debit card.

In addition, from that time until 06:27 of the same day, the Defendant deceivingd the victim by settling the sum of 700,000 won with the above physical card four times, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table, and acquired the pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount and used the stolen debit card.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's person;

arrow