Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On January 9, 2015, the Defendant listened to the statement that the Defendant 112, in front of the public restaurant “C,” located in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongju-si, to return home from E in the circumstances belonging to the D District of the Cheongdong Police Station D District of the Cheongdong Police Station, which was called by the Defendant after receiving a 112 report that the Defendant frighted, and sent to the Cheongju-gu, Cheongdong-gu, Cheongdong-gu, Cheongdong-gu, and did not go to the house where the Cheongdong-gu, Cheongdong-gu, Cheongdong-gu, Cheongdong-gu, Cheongdong-gu, Cheongdong-gu, Cheongdong-gu, the Defendant did not go to the house where the flobbbbbbbbbbbbs are fright, and the Defendant sponed to the public-use guidance board, which is a flopped sign.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of statutes, such as field photographs (No. 4 No. 5 of the evidence list);

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of each fine for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (Aggravation of concurrent crimes with punishment stipulated for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties heavier than the hostage)

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order and the circumstances of the crime are not exceptionally against the defendant. However, the punishment is determined as ordered in consideration of the following factors: (a) the defendant seriously reflects the defendant's mistake; (b) the defendant has no criminal records such as the same criminal records other than the second criminal records due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act; (c) the defendant has paid an agreed amount to the victimized police officials; and (d) the defendant has paid the agreed amount; and (c)