logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.04.24 2017고단5242
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

[Criminal record] On January 11, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a six-year term for fraud at the Suwon Friwon, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on January 19, 2018.

[Criminal facts]

1. The accused and C shall establish and operate a call center for the commission of the phishing in China, and instruct the accused and C to withdraw and transfer the money deposited by the victims. The accused and C shall withdraw and transfer the money from the phishing damage under the direction of the person without the name of the victim and receive 6% of the withdrawn money from the commission.

A. A. On September 7, 2016, the victim victim D’s false statement stating that “A fee is required for the lending of a loan” was paid to the victim D by telephone and misrepresenting the victim D’s staff, and around 19:38 of the same day from the victim to the company bank account (F) in the name of E at least four times on the same day, and the Defendant and C withdrawn KRW 700,000 from the cash withdrawal date of the Saemaul Bank of Korea, located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the same day at around 20:39, the Defendant and C deposited KRW 810,000 from the nearby age cash payment date to the account of the non-named person.

As a result, the defendant and C were provided property by deceiving the victim in collusion with the person with no name.

B. On September 8, 2016, on the part of 14:20 on September 14:20, 2016, the victim G calls and misrepresents the victim G with the central inspection investigator, prosecutor, and staff of the Financial Supervisory Service in order, and falsely speaks that “When the new passbook is involved in an offense and is sent money to the virtual account, it is likely to safely protect the victim.” From the victim, the victim is KRW 1.8 million with the corporate bank account (F) in the name of E around 17:56 on the same day, around 17:56 on the same day, around 18:23 on the same day, KRW 1.8 million with the same account, around 18:46 on the same day, the Defendant and C received KRW 4 million from the national bank account in the name of H, around 18:06 on the same day, around 18:06 on the same day.

arrow