logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.05.18 2017고합25
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 9, 1976, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year with prison labor for larceny; three years with prison labor for one year with prison labor for larceny in the Daejeon District Court Seosan Branch on December 29, 1982; five hundred thousand won with prison labor for larceny from the Suwon District Court on February 4, 1984 to a fine of five hundred thousand won; one year and six months with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Seoul District Court on March 20, 1985 to the Daegu District Court on January 23, 1992; and one year and six months with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny); one year with prison labor from the Jeonju District Court on September 4, 1997 to a fine of three years with prison labor for larceny; and one year with prison labor from the Seoul District Court on May 15, 2002 to a maximum one thousand won with prison labor.

On December 6, 2016, the Defendant taken out 30,000 won in cash owned by the victim C, and wallets whose market price includes transportation cards is unknown at the bus stops located in 10, e.g., Mayang-si, Mayang-si, Mayang-si, Mayangyang-si, the Defendant:

They go back.

As a result, the defendant was sentenced to punishment twice or more due to larceny, etc., and habitually stolen the victim's property within three years after the execution of the sentence is completed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. On-site photographs and CCTV video CDs;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: A reply to inquiries, such as criminal history, and current status of personal expropriation;

1. Habituality of the judgment: The defendant was punished nine times by committing a crime under the same and the defendant committed a crime under the same law in a short period after being sentenced to imprisonment; and the defendant committed a crime under the same law within the same time after being released.

arrow