logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2017.03.31 2016고단1573
폭행등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, at around September 29, 2016, assaulted the victim C (Woo, age 71) located in B (Woo, age 71) on September 29, 2016, with the victim from the heading room 105, with a telecommunication note from the victim’s room to the victim by telephone.

Although the victim requested that the victim had been late, it was assaulted by his hand, such as less than the victim's blick and less the victim's blick, more than once.

2. Definating;

A. On September 30, 2016, at around 00:35, the Defendant: (a) reported 112 at the entrance of the Dotour parking lot located in B, while having a taxi engineer E and his nameless female; and (b) left the victim G, the police box affiliated with the Defendant, and the victim H of the police boat, who called up on the floor, on the ground that he was called up on the ground of the Dotour Kim Fab., and (c) carried out the Do to the victim G and the police box victim H on the floor.

“Publicly insulting victims by speaking as a large sound.”

B. The Defendant, at around 00:45 on the same day, was the victim E, who is a taxi engineer, among the circumstances leading up to the F police box belonging to the F police box at the parking lot of the F police box located in I at around 00:45 on the same day, and the police officer at the police box.

10 10 10 100 10

In a large sound, “the victim was openly insulting.”

3. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties on the same day, at around 00:50 on the same day, takes a bath to E who is a taxi engineer at the parking lot of the police box, and the police officer assigned to the F police box that prevents the Defendant from drinking expenses, shall be the police officer.

“In doing so, assaulted on the floor of the said J one time with the said floor of hand.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties concerning civil petition handling affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to J and E;

1. Each written statement of G, H and E;

1. On-site photographs;

1. A report on investigation (as to the attachment of CCTV image data taken by a suspect for committing a crime);

1. Application of each statute on filing of a complaint;

1. Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act in relation to the facts constituting an offense (the point of violence), Article 311 of the Criminal Act (the point of insult in each insult), and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties).

arrow