logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2014.07.03 2014고단506
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding nine million won.

Where the above fine is not paid, one million won shall be converted into one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 2, 2004, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch on June 2, 2004, a summary order of KRW 4 million for the same crime in the same court on June 29, 2006, and a summary order of KRW 1 million for the same crime in the same court on February 5, 2008, respectively, and a person who was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for the same crime in the same court on December 4, 2008.

On April 27, 2014, at around 19:50, the Defendant driven a B knife car under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.139% in front of the Gnife Community Center located in the Donife-dong in the Gunife-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Report on the status of running a driving under the direction of the driving under the direction of the driving under the direction of the driving under the direction of the driving under the direction of the driving under the direction of the driver

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (verification reports of the same kind of power) and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act of the choice of punishment (the crime of this case was committed even after a court was sentenced to a stay of execution as stated in the judgment of the same kind of crime, which added an order to attend a school, and the victim expressed the victim's desire to commit the crime of this case after causing a minor contact accident during the commission of the crime of this case, but the crime of this case was committed before the judgment, considering the fact that the crime of this case was committed before six years, and is deemed to have been endeavored to refrain from driving under the influence of alcohol during the said period; the confession and reflect of the crime; the support relationship

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow